Teaching Joint Problem-Solving Skills in Co‑Produced Digital Courses

Problem-solving is a top skill students seek. Teaching it jointly adds value by modeling diverse thinking and collaborative resolution. When co-producers teach together, showcasing dual approaches to challenges demonstrates adaptability and teamwork. This article guides you through designing a problem-solving curriculum that leverages co-teaching, real-world examples, and iterative student interaction.

1. Define the Problem-Solving Framework Together

  • Choose or co-create a logical problem-solving model (e.g. define → analyze → ideate → implement).
  • Co-produce thinking routines: “Instructor A leads define; B contrasts with brainstorming.”
  • Shared frameworks show collaboration in action.

2. Launch with a Co-Diagnosis Case Study

  • Present a real issue (e.g., course launch stalled)—co-instructors analyze together.
  • Record a video segment discussing possible root causes, featuring your different viewpoints.
  • Modeling co-analysis helps students internalize dual-thinking strategies.

3. Break Modules Along Problem-Solving Phases

  • Each course module corresponds to a framework step, taught by different instructors.
  • Key checkpoints: student reflection, B-led peer discussion, A-led group review.
  • Co-differentiation supports varied learner perspectives.

4. Use Paired Instructor Q&A Walkthroughs

  • Add dual-instructor walkthrough videos responding to sample problems.
  • One asks questions as student, the other responds, then switch roles.
  • This co-teaching builds dynamic modeling and real thinking.

5. Assign Students Co-Planning Partner Activities

  • Pair peers and assign tasks like root-cause diagnosis or solution ideation.
  • Provide co-instructor prompts guiding pairs through phases.
  • Encourage group-sharing: both instructors provide feedback on group solutions.

6. Include Instructor “Think-Aloud” Moments

  • Record each instructor solving a mini-problem live, narrating internal reasoning.
  • Students hear both structured thinking patterns (“I’m asking myself…”).

7. Develop Real-Time Collaborative Challenges

  • Host co-led problem-solving live sessions with audience participation.
  • Divide roles: A facilitates; B synthesizes options; student roles are coached live.
  • Create an interactive tone that shows synergy in problem-solving.

8. Offer Resource Templates and Co-Produced Tools

  • Provide worksheets and frameworks, co-branded and collaboratively built.
  • Include video instructions from each instructor on how to use them.
  • Structured tools help student follow collaborative logic.

9. Curate External Expert Mini-Labs

  • Invite a guest expert to demonstrate step in framework.
  • Co-instructors facilitate elaboration, modeling respectful co-learning.
  • Expert adds depth, duo adds coherence.

10. Integrate Quiz-Based Problem Scenarios

  • Design quizzes with real-world problems; A teaches analysis; B teaches solution.
  • Include branching scenarios encouraging applied thinking.
  • Co-created assessments reinforce dual-thinking in solving.

11. Showcase Alumni Problem Solutions

  • Allow students to submit capstone projects demonstrating application.
  • Co-instructors give joint feedback sessions highlighting strengths and thought diversity.
  • Student outcomes show real-world co-production value.

12. Teach Metacognition Through Co-Reflection

  • Conduct meta-recognition videos: each describes how they approached today’s problem.
  • Students journal their own approach comparison.
  • Dual metacognition builds higher thinking awareness.

13. Provide a Shared Troubleshooting Forum

  • Create discussion board dedicated to problem-solving queries.
  • Both instructors moderate rotatingly, showing how they approach student answers.
  • Collective troubleshooting supports peer learning.

14. Set Up Mini Hackathons or Sprints

  • Run 3-day sprint events focused on solving a common course challenge.
  • Co-instructors guide phases with deadlines, feedback, iteration.
  • Projects show problem progress in real time.

15. Evaluate Problem-Solving Skills with Rubrics

  • Create rubrics that assess thinking logic, creativity, collaboration.
  • Co-instructors use them jointly in peer-review or instructor-review loops.
  • Rubrics help students grasp co-produced grading standards.

16. Encourage Reflection on Co-Produced Thinking

  • Prompt learners: “What did you learn from A’s approach vs B’s?”
  • Discussion prompts reinforce nuanced understanding.

17. Use Data to Refine Problem-Solving Sections

  • Track quiz ratings, completion rates, support requests.
  • Co-instructors meet to evaluate: Did students struggle with analysis or ideation? Adjust accordingly.

18. Market Co-Producing Thinking as Differentiator

  • Promote: “Learn problem-solving from two perspectives.”
  • Share short video snippets of A and B solving the same issue differently.

19. Build a Post-Course Problem-Solving Hub

  • Offer alumni access to a problem library.
  • Students can revisit past problems with dual walkthroughs.
  • Co-instructor updates allow continued skill application.

20. Reflect and Evolve the Framework Together

  • After each cohort, analyze student performance and feedback.
  • Co-instructors reflect: what worked well? What requires rewriting?
  • Update the problem framework and incorporate insights into the next version.

Deixe um comentário